View Single Post
  #165  
Old 11-08-2011, 08:29 PM
Brinkman Brinkman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinkman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What is your OPINION on Item recharging, to you think VI implimented it and intended it to work the way it does ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sorry, I got a business call when I was trying to respond.



A middle ground exists. Whether or not it was intended; it was classic. There are excellent examples of when it should be allowed and excellent examples of when it shouldn't, and as a result, I agree with the current implementation: allowing recharging of items and keep in line with the classic time line. If something is found to be game breaking (hoop) fix it. Leave everything else as is until it is planned to be changed, if it is to be changed at all. There's no reason to condemn the entire system because of a single flaw (that's been fixed).
Boy did you dance around this question!

I did not ask if it was classic.

I did not ask if it was game breaking.

I did not ask if you felt only severe examples should be changed.

I did not ask if you felt there was a reason to condem the entire system.


I asked, and I am asking once again. Do you believe ( you know, your personal opinion ) that in 1999 the devs who created everquest implimented and intended vendor recharging?