Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
From what I can tell, you've now realised I was correct but still refuse to concede it openly because you seem to either have some resentment towards me for being right or are too proud for being wrong yourself.
|
Based on your posts I realized I was in error for using the word "fact" one time, and the tone of my Op was off because of that. With that, I changed my OP dramatically.
Doing all of that should have shown quite obviously that I was OPENLY conceding to the idea that I cannot prove VI didnt intend for vendor recharging to be in game.
Seriously , come one. This is part of my edited OP
"There is no proof that can be gathered at this time that completely proves VI was against item recharging "
Would you like me to start a new post saying Samoht was right, its an opinion!!
What I wont let go of is my opinion.
This thread is allowed in Server chat because its not considered a bug atm. Its quite obvious that the devs on p99 felt item recharging needed to be in game... as using the titanium client as a base, they had to unbreak item recharging. What I am doing is saying I think it needs to be looked at again.
How about instead of trolling my thread, and trying to get it moved you answer one simple question.
What is your opinion on how Vendor recharging works, do you think that the way its done was implimented by VI and intended to work that way? I.E needing two of the same item, having to sell items in a certain order and so on. Do you THINK it was intended?