Quote:
Originally Posted by fishingme
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I know what it means. The original argument isn't what makes it stronger. It's "The correct usage of name." Get with the program.
|
The correct usage of the name depends on the allegation that all X is tainted with potentiators to increase effectiveness per dollar materials cost. Since such potentiators don't even exist, your argument falls apart.
See where we're going with that?