View Single Post
  #5  
Old 11-04-2011, 09:59 AM
Tommy_Wiseau Tommy_Wiseau is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waffen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i think what fishingme is trying to say is...how often can one acquire an x pill and guarantee that mdma is the only substance contained inside? therefore it's easier to label molly as being pure mdma, and ecstacy being, in most cases, cut with a shit ton of other drugs. hence the "watered down soda" metaphor.

p.s. i understand molly could have additives as well, but for the sake of the arguement, let's not nitpick. -_-
the entire argument is a semantic nitpick. I was just calling him on the only objective claim he made. Dude earlier argued that there are additives that potentiate MDMA - after being called on it, backpedaled to there being just shitty cheap dex and amphetamines added.

As for good and bad rolls, I've never had a bad one with either molly (as the powder form of mdma is colloquially known) or x (as the pressed pill form of MDMA+binder is known). My sources aren't brown. If a batch of pills I had access to contained MDMA and some unknown poisonous bullshit, I wouldn't call it ecstasy or any name except dangerous and not fit for human consumption.

But hey, as I said, my sources aren't brown. ymmv.