Quote:
Originally Posted by burkemi5
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you're avoiding arguing about the main point, whether or not racism is justified.
|
Racism is justified if you agree that the bell curve of a population group is what matters, not outlier data, and integration with a group scoring on average, considerably lower than yours, would significantly decrease your level of civilization.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burkemi5
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
and yeah, i am in a field that requires me to be cognizant of diversity and racism so i am taking a graduate level diversity class. pretty common actually for my field of study.
|
And the main teaching of this class is, it's only racist if white people do it, right?
Anyway, not sure if you're aware, but America had a pretty much "western Europe only" immigration policy until 1965 when the law was changed. The main group involved in changing this law, viewed homogeneous societies as being hostile to their ethnic group so they started pushing "diversity" as being a good thing. In reality, they pushed it entirely out of self preservation.
These procedures are well documented in the following article, you can view the mountain of references at the bottom:
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-immigration.html
The whole diversity thing is pretty much a joke. Political correctness, diversity, both are offspring of Marxism. Today it's selfishly pushed by tiny ethnic groups that don't care what effect it has on the other 98% of the population. In terms of objective benefits, homogeneous civilizations far outweigh "diverse" ones. Racial nepotism is a huge source of conflict and internal problems, especially failed attempts at integration. Without going into specifics of which ones, Caucasian and Asian female intermarriage rates are something like 40%, other groups are 4% and can't be considered anything but a failure.