Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It has to break first before you can reapply it, as per this circa 2000 post.
|
http://www.angelfire.com/bc/brentcop.../jan06003.html
^
Doesn't say that at all. It explains there are two checks, one vs MR and another vs level. And that the failure of the second check was not announced and needed to be addressed.
http://members.fortunecity.com/drabqe/index.html
^
Also states it's a memblur, heh.
http://blog.amin.org/dapeng/2010/03/21/
^
It also states that using the Jonthan's line is useless if you have a worn haste item because they don't stack
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
http://brisk555666.tripod.com/id7.html
Still just cut and paste from EQDiva that every other thread about this has been based on. I think in the actual entry, there are a few comments specifically stating this is wrong and that there isn't a target cap. Was brought up in another recent thread about this song.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Theres no level cap on this right now.
|
You sure?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I dont really get your "spam click the song", if you keep playing a song -- doesnt it reapply itself as fast as clicking on it? I thought that was the case.
|
No, it does not work like that.
Anyways, I will agree that Kelin's isn't working as it should. But from reading, the only thing that is really missing in this point at time is the second level check to make it more resistable (or both checks are there, and they aren't working properly). This is the only thing I can see that's actually strongly supported by a reliable source from the first link. But he also mentions this check was present with the enchanter's line, too. Not to mention this check was removed at some point, not sure when though.
I really hate to sound nit-picky, but I don't put a lot of faith in these Billy Bob's guide to whatever that half the time was cut and pasted from other guides without any actual due diligence. Or rife with glaring errors as already pointed out. And a lot of the time have several comments regarding an entry as plain wrong. If that's the level of scrutiny we're going with, I can dig up some REALLY fun stuff.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]