Quote:
|
1> snare/root/stun/blind and any spells with these effects as a secondary were highly resistable, at 100 mr there was a 90% chance to resist these, higher still and you eliminated them completely other than the default 2% or 5% chance to land.
|
I basically agree with this.
Quote:
|
2> mez was less resistable than the above, however at 100 mr you pretty much were not sticking one, this is why enchanters always began the fight with tash, and after landing one they were generally pretty effective. mana sieve was about the same as mez in terms of resistance.
|
I basically agree with this
Quote:
3> all direct damage nukes without secondary effects such as a debuff, stun etc still hit for the majority of their damage even well past 150 resist. lets use starfire for an example, after the pvp damage nerf it does 410 on a full.
lets say i am fighting someone with 150 fr, 5 casts would have looked something like the following: 327, 352, 410, 286, 349
|
Do not agree, you are being too generious with those nuke numbers.
Quote:
|
4> don't think you can partially resist a dot, if you can it didnt happen often enough to remember it, things like plague and ebolt resisted frequently because of the all/nothing aspect of the spells but still landed a lot as well, 115 poison resistance and ebolts would still hit me a good 60% of the time.
|
Basically
Quote:
|
5> lifetaps, dispels, druid swarm line, damage shields, harm touches among others were simply not resisted in pvp.
|
lifetaps/swarms/HTs very hard to resist, but not impossilbe. Damage Shields and Dispels are in a whole other category.