View Single Post
  #1  
Old 04-12-2010, 01:21 PM
Sono_hito Sono_hito is offline
Scrawny Gnoll

Sono_hito's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Anthropomorphic Unreality
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stormlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well, if WOW is being played by my sister, everything is a lot clearer. Not to say WOW has anything wrong with it, but it's a lot friendlier than eq was in 1999! In 1999, things weren't exactly hard, we had friends, lots of friends. But the aim was different, the audience was different. Hmm. I don't think there's anything wrong with WOW going in a social direction. In fact, i think that's a great thing to see. We've seen a lot of that in EQ over the years. We've pointed to it and made it one of the reasons EQ was so great in 1999.

I think that when there're a lot of people playing things are easier in EQ. When you take the people away, things get a lot harder. I know I feel best in EQ when there're other people to help, other people to see, other people to remember in my thoughts. We're dependent on eachother, and when there's no one else to turn to, you're as good as dead in this game unless you can solo. But that ain't good enough anyway. This, like WOW, is an MMO. We need other people, not just to play the game, but to socially meld and make friends.
I guess i meant that in EQ, you group as a means to an end, that of killing and lving up. In games like WoW, the game is easy enough to play without groups. Which makes it boring to me. So you group to have social interaction in what i consider an otherwise unfulfilling game.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. - Douglas Adams