View Single Post
  #88  
Old 09-07-2011, 10:35 PM
Not_Kazowi Not_Kazowi is offline
Planar Protector

Not_Kazowi's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,473
Send a message via AIM to Not_Kazowi
Default

buhbuh dude i see your points and agree but chill out with the wall of text posts please.


Envious is pretty right about GM intervention = bad news though. I mean yes, some intervention is needed. We will need a GM on for the hackers and exploiters as well as the common need of bugs and such found by players. But the way VZTZ handled about 70% of the situations was just retarded and detrimental in the long run.


A GM basically can come in and cause MORE grief by making a decision such as guild A and B LNS for 1 hour then refight for the zone, after guild B already established control. This causes more whining and grief therefor putting MORE work on the GM staff.

Worst case scenario we let there be player governed rules etc for the first bit and if it just turns into a complete shit show? then add GM intervention. I just think that GMs staying out of things will really help the server, after enough time it will be live like.


I just know that being leader of Heresy, I **ALWAYS** wanted to prevent getting a GM involved unless we were blatantly hacked on (kringe) or trained out of control. I don't even care about the training situation anymore, as long as a GM doesn't always have his hand in guild politics or major pvp battles, it just gets old and arbitrary.
__________________