Quote:
Originally Posted by Secrets
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
To Whom It May Concern,
I am Secrets, Ex-Project 1999 ("The Website") Developer. We ("Project 1999") have been informed that you are posting a false cease and desist letter against us to slander an ex-developer ("Uthgaard") by claiming the reason he left was in fact, your slanderous claims of Us ("Project 1999") receiving a Cease and Desist letter. This is not true, and I am looking to take you to court for no reason especially since we do not make profit and I want to screw you out of your hard-earned money.
To further invalidate your claims, here's a copy of an actual SOE C&D letter that EQClassic ("EQClassic.org") received.
(img was here)
Here's the same website:
www.eqclassic.org
Notice the actual C&D and not your made up Cease and Desist. Keep in mind the Supreme Court of CA's website has no information on this document that you submitted to us.
Each of our players are valuable to Us. We don't ask You to pay a single dime. We don't even get paid for this.
Therefore, as the registered forum troll of Our website, I hereby ask you to stop posting slander on Our website effective immediately, or face legal issues that are pointless to us both.
Failure to comply within 10 ("Ten") days will result in immediate removal of your forum access, and You will be tarred with feathers and oil.
Please contact me through PMs on this website should you have any questions related to this matter. Nothing contained in this post shall be constructed as an admission or as a waiver of any rights or remedies that Project 1999 may have online to ban you, all of which are hereby expressly reserved. |
FYI it's liable (written) not slander (spoken), and I Never said it was definitively the reason he left... only that if executed it could have been the reason. Obviously is has not been executed or sent so thus there is no point unless they do take action; at which time I am certain that It will be dealt with and SOE will return to their corner tail tucked and all will be as it was.
Also, like I said before Sony sends thousands of these out, they vary in length and depth but rarely do they ever act on them. I don't see why it would be prohibited to post a preliminary document in the rants/flames section... if people think its fake then so be it. All I know is what I see come across the wire.
Background:
As a remote administrator of several legal firms I simply have access to all of the frivolous suits and the preliminaries that most people don't... excuse me for trying to help out whomever is running this project by giving them a heads up. If you would like the Un-redacted version and are a developer. I would gladly produce it from WestLaw. Just send me a PM.
--Thanks