Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Keep telling yourself it's not a monopoly, even though you haven't refuted my argument.
|
See? Gloomlord will never admit he doesn't understand what "monopoly" means. His incorrect definition will always be how he frames the discussion.
That is why a back and forth will not work. Gloomlord will never agree on the correct definition of "monopoly", and all of his arguments flow from this incorrect definition. You can't logically persuade someone that 1 + 1 = 2 when they are using a random mathematical rule set that allows 1 + 1 = 52.