View Single Post
  #9  
Old 06-23-2026, 03:44 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is online now
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Neither do Manastones? Wasn't rubicite also /list? Point being, there's no real way to make an argument that the staff wouldn't decide to do a /list system for a specific camp. They've shown a willingness to do /list for both legacy and non-legacy items when they've viewed the monopolization as unfair.

They're unlikely to do /list systems for items currently because they just don't seem to have the time or energy for the project as of today (not saying that as a slight towards them). But there's literally no way to say that they are unwilling to do it for a given item on a given server.

At any rate, this has gone way off topic from the original point of the thread. Not surprised given the people who are engaging in the comments.
The /list system was originally designed for legacy items on the launch of Green. It is obvious that legacy items would be part of the /list system.

The non-legacy camps that were mentioned are raid specific camps, and the /list system is only applied to those camps on Green. This makes sense, because the best strategy for the top guild on a fresh server is to deny raid items like VP keys from other guilds for as long as possible. Blue doesn't have this problem due to it's age.

This is the pattern for /list camps so far:
1. Legacy items (Future Servers only, as all legacy items no longer drop)
2. Raid specific items that were strategically being withheld from other guilds (Green and Future Servers)

It looks like you just read the last line of my post and skipped the rest lol. I'll put this as the last line, so maybe you'll read my post this time.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 06-23-2026 at 04:01 PM..
Reply With Quote