Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
LMAO. Ignoring the facts and more gaslighting, as always.
Keep repeating the fallacious "evidence" catchphrase ad nauseum as a losing attempt to discount the extensive personal experiences that have been presented. You're the one who has no evidence — your entire sad argument is built on a single example where you don't need instant break, trying to say "see, I didn't need it!", while ignoring the amount of time you're losing with your playstyle.
If there was a competitive environment around this, then all of the most successful players would be using instant charm break. Only someone who has never played an action game competitively would ever attempt to argue otherwise. Structured tournaments of exactly equal conditions where people compete to see who can kill more NPC's via charm in 8 hours will never exist in this game, but the effect of that gameplay still exists.
Especially after the resist and channeling changes get put in, you are NOT going to want to be stuck casting a spell unnecessarily. If a charm break happens while casting invis, that's crucial time you've now lost that should have been spent casting stun, and the split second difference of casting stun before they get in melee range is going to be the difference between life and death at times.
|
You completely missed the point of the Enchanter video I posted. It wasn't to show off a playstyle. This is because you want to insult me, rather than have a discussion. I am not suprised, since you are clearly having a difficult time with basic comprehension.
There are varying degrees of the claim "instant cast invis is superior for charm breaks".
The only purpose of
this video is to disprove the most extreme version of the claim, which is "instant cast invis is required to get full XP and save mana via cheaper nukes on charm break". You can use a cheaper nuke and get full XP without instant cast invis, as the video shows.
YOU are the one making the positive claim "instant cast invis is superior for charm breaks". YOU need to supply the evidence for that positive claim. The reason why you don't is because it takes a lot of effort to do, as you need to record multiple long play sessions with charm and compare kills per hour. You probably know I am right as well, so you don't want to spend the time proving me right.
You do understand that you are casting GGR or RoST to BREAK charm, right? If charm breaks during the cast, you just duck RoST. The mob is already broken, so you don't need to finish the RoST cast. And if you want to make the positive claim "ducking takes too much time away from your stun cast", you'll need to supply evidence for that claim too.