Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If it was another person, I'd agree. But DSM shows he's capable of critical thinking with his in-depth analysis, yet when people mention things like
...
He doubles down
|
People are allowed to stick to their guns. I am not sure why you think that if a few people say "I don't like the way you wrote X", that immediately requires a change in the writing. To me this just seems entitled, especially since you aren't contributing to the wiki yourself. You are just complaining about other people's work. Complaining is easy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ergo the mean-spirited talk. It's always been the same problem with DSM. Any criticism toward him: he treats as trolling. In his mind, he is infallible and incapable of making mistakes or his opinion not being shared by the larger community.
Futhermore, he's treating a wiki, which is a collaborative effort by many people, as his own fuckin manual for the game.
|
All of this is factually trolling and lies. I have admitted to being wrong plenty of times on these forums. The post history hasn't changed.
This is simply a repeated lie that trolls tell, while never giving any evidence to support it.
If you don't want to be called out for being a troll, don't spam threads with comments like:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Was going to link the wiki page but DeathsSilkyMist shit up the page with his "Wrath" calculations. Goddamnit.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Seriously, you shit up what was once a very simple page. Instead of creating a new page with "advanced calculations and proof" you put it on the main game mechanics page.
You suck.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You suck.
57 edits in 4 days. You fuckin loser.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's supposed to be a simple page, and you shit it up with 57 edits, with all your different examples.
It's supposed to be a simple page, and you shit it up with 57 edits, trying to prove you are good at figuring out formulas.
It's supposed to be a simple page, and you shit it up with 57 edits, including your dumbass videos.
You suck. Nobody here likes you.
|
Any reasonable person would call you out for this bad behavior. It isn't simply me calling you a troll to avoid critisism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlob
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He might be that but you are seriously being mean for no reason. What do you hope to accomplish with these comments, except making someone feel like shit? There is enough suffering in the world as is. Please don't consciously make the decision to increase it.
DSM, I think that you contribute a lot with your in depth analysis. Keep up the good work.
That being said, I agree that the formulas might be a bit intimidating for a new player and might be easier for a newer player if it was kept simple, and maybe the more complex stuffed moved to an "advanced mechanics" or something page.
|
Thank you for the support. I did improve the page a bit to try and make it more readable. But that page is specifically for technical game formulas. This is the first sentence at the top of the page:
Quote:
|
This page is intended for a more technical discussion of the game mechanics. For instance, equations governing combat, how STA translates into HP, how the con color system scales with level.
|