Quote:
Originally Posted by Kich867
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I mean, or they just actually got scammed and didn't communicate exactly what happened perfectly here but the adjudicator of the rules who has significantly better visibility into the exact events identified they should be reimbursed due to what actually happened.
|
I mean doesn't sound like a scam based on how OP wrote it. So I'm not going to go "oh yeah maybe he was scammed and just didn't tell us"