i wrote out a whole response but had to feed it through Gemini to remove the stuff that would get me banned for talking about politics
Here is a grammar and fact check of your text, followed by a revised version that removes the hyperbolic political commentary while keeping your core economic argument intact.
The current AI sector is already in a 'too big to fail' category, dwarfing the scale of previous bailouts. Rather than a repeat of the dot-com bust, we are seeing a continuation of the trend from the last two recessions where market corrections were largely mitigated by intervention. The market has drifted from traditional fundamentals for decades; one could argue the last purely organic crash occurred in the 1980s.
Microsoft’s strategy appears to be a calculated hedge. By owning a significant stake in OpenAI—valued at approximately $135 billion following OpenAI's restructuring into a public benefit corporation—Microsoft avoids the overhead of building a frontier lab from scratch. They are positioned to absorb the most valuable assets if OpenAI fails to meet its obligations or faces a liquidity crisis.
Furthermore, US capital lacks productive alternatives. Investment in European markets remains stagnant, and Chinese software competition often functions as economic warfare. By offering high-end AI video generators with minimal copyright restrictions and low costs, Chinese firms are undercutting Western models to gain an advantage in the geopolitical AI race. These developments are driven by state-level competition rather than consumer interest, leading toward a radical restructuring of the national debt and global reserve currency standards.
|