Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When did I confirm anything of the sort? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Have you even read this thread you are commenting in? It references two very specific examples of obvious bugs making Enchanters unclassically powerful ... bugs which have existed for years, but haven't been fixed. |
Like I stated the changes you are asking for and that are described in those bug-reports might well be correct and might well become implemented at some point. I am mostly concerned with your insinuations that Niblog is acting in bad faith and that the reason he has not implemented these changes is due to him holding the enchanter in unduly high regard.
What I mean is, you state that enchanter is Niblog's pet class but you base this on nothing but the fact that he has not implemented these specific changes that would affect the enchanter negatively and which you believe should be implemented vis a vis the project's stated goals of achieving "classic" EverQuest to the era.
But as far as I can tell that is completely speculative and it has you making assumptions you have no base to make on Niblog's motivations. There could be a myriad of reasons why these changes have not been implemented but you basically assume that it must be because Niblog has a biased affection for the enchanter class.
When I asked you about this you admitted that you didn't know but that you are inferring that enchanter is his pet class and that "I'd bet you $20 that if we could get Nilbog to say what class he played on live, it would be Enchanter.".
What I am getting at is that you seem to be laboring under the weight of a conspiracy. That Niblog
knows the correct thing beholden to the spirit of the project is to nerf the enchanter but he is resisting doing this because enchanter is his pet class. And I am just saying that there could be many different reasons why these changes have not been implemented.