For there to be inequality in a world where robots have made labor obsolete (let alone any job) it would have to be a full blown cybertronic police state. Or the 8 billion humans who were starving and out of work would kill their masters and rip every robot to pieces.
I strongly believe the humans would defeat the robots should inequality arise.
Were talking 8+ billion people vs, 200, 300 million robots. It would take a long time to build more than that.
Quote:
Q: given ai take over, and resources, and time and costs that go into building anything, even by a completely automated workforce. How long would it approximately take to produce 200 million labor robots.
A: If you include real-world bottlenecks and resources, it could easily stretch to 10–20 years.
|
Even to get to the point that we'd be building the "t-100s" that were able to police us and couldn't be defeated with a jump rope tangling up their ankles, we'd already have to be at a point where most menial labor jobs have already long since been replaced.
By then there would either be a amicable resolution between the bot makers, and the billions of people who once had jobs who don't now and are starving... or a revolution that would have made one.