Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ok, finished my parses.
No Shield:
1723 hits
71563 total damage
41.534 damage/hit
Shield in back:
1060 hits
44391 total damage
41.878 damage/hit
Shield in secondary:
1397 hits
58285 total damage
41.721 damage/hit
This is awesome, the most-hilarious scenario I outlined the other day is coming true. I'll do a little more data analysis later and give DSM the equal-hit-count analysis he wants, but might be tomorrow before I get to it.
|
My tests are only using worn AC. Taking a look at your previous comment:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just finished a test against Shiel Glimmerspindel, using a 60 druid. Both sides had 198 worn ac and 61 spell ac for a total of 259.
|
You are using spell AC to go over 200 AC.
My two guesses right now are:
1. Spell AC is not softcapped.
2. Priest softcap may be higher than 200. I haven't locked in any of the softcap values yet. I am using the EQEMU as a starting point.
Our tests aren't 1 to 1 right now since you are using spell AC, and you can't get above 300 AC. It isn't that suprising there may be a difference.
I'll do a spell AC test to see if it gets softcapped.