Quote:
|
i know nazi germany didn't conscript kids and the elderly till the very end iirc, there's numerous reasons they send young men off to begin with instead of 30+ yr olds and unlike "the kids" we have a proven track record of being managable and well behaved and we actually know shit so they might need us
|
You may not understand. I'm not talking about 12-14 year olds like the "kids", and I'm not talking about 75+ year old "elderly".
Ukraine conscripted 27-60 year olds first. And increased it to 25-65 year olds recently.
Quote:
|
From 1935, Germany’s Military Service Law put boys through 6 months of labor service at 18, then two years of military service starting at 19. That means the typical new private in 1938 was about 19–21, while conscription legally ran up to about 40
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekco
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
that's eastern europe for ya
|
Ahctually it is unusual for "eastern Europe":
It is a progressive western idea to ensure the future generations have something to live for direct from the good ol us of a:
Quote:
"Ukrainian officials should ensure they protect the youngest men to avoid further demographic decimation and help rebuild the country after the war.”
-U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken
|
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...ce=chatgpt.com
It's
ahcthually the opposite of "Eastern European" tradition:
Quote:
historically, Eastern European armies tended to conscript younger men compared to Western Europe, especially during the 19th and early 20th centuries.
In empires like Russia, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire, mandatory service usually began in the late teens to early 20s.
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscr...ce=chatgpt.com