Quote:
Originally Posted by TytosOfEight
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You haven’t done anything wrong. From the start of this thread, your intentions and what you were testing have been clear. This isn’t an academic paper, and while this is kind of a peer review process, the context here is much more informal. Bcbrown’s point about you needing to state an a priori hypothesis, while technically correct, comes off as the kind of pedantic argument an undergraduate might make to win a petty debate. In this context, it’s completely irrelevant.
Frankly, the toxicity directed at you in these threads is bizarre. You haven’t done anything to warrant such attacks, and honestly, it’s just a bit odd. You come across as someone genuinely interested in the game and trying to approach things properly and with good intentions.
My advice is to just ignore the bullies and keep doing what you’re doing.
|
Thank you for the support! I appreciate the post.