Quote:
Originally Posted by Bones
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not a THJ crowd member, but you are just wrong here buddy. The popularity of THJ is what caused the lawsuit. The monetization was just legal ammo, if you cant see that you simply do not understand how this shit works, or you are just being intentionally disingenuous out of anger for what's happening and wanting to point the finger and probably a die hard anti-RMT guy. Its pointed in the right direction, but at the wrong thing. This is THJs fault, but its not because of RMT.
DBG was bleeding players to THJ. They knew it. The cash shop literally just gave them easy legal ammo for a quick judicial decision for a preliminary injunction. Even if THJ didn't make any money at all and there was no cash shop, they are STILL at the very least issuing a C&D in that scenario, and then moving on to lawsuit if the C&D is not abided; a lawsuit they still win in that scenario EVEN if there was no RMT going on, because DBG was able to prove with quarterly reports on revenue that they were bleeding money and subscriptions while THJs active player numbers were going up.
|
I mean to be clear an IP owner doesn't need "easy legal ammo" to enforce their IP. They can get an injunction whenever they want.
The one thing I think that goes against the population argument is that when Green launched there were over 2,000 people on the server and Daybreak didn't try to pull any shenanigans to try to revoke the agreement. Quarm has had a lot of people on it too, and Daybreak just asked them to remove certain custom content and agree not to go past a certain expansion (IIRC). They seem to understand there is a certain amount of goodwill/PR by allowing emulated servers to exist, but they have historically had a problem if they think you're going to try and monetize it.