yeah that's what im getting at the historical accounts as accurate as possible and agreed by all sides, then both points of view listed where agreement can't be reached and commentary by the author on it, who ideally isn't someone from the community(AI most likely) coming in with their own bias none of which would be appropriate for the wiki, like the thread from 2014 i linked a page ago
the Wired/Ars Technica writer who did the eve book had to go interview people and do investigative journalism to fill in the gaps and the entire thing was crowd funded
lotta parallels with eve and p99 also as far as hacking forums and doxing and crazy shit
|