I'm aware. I know what an homiletics is. I disagree that "fallacy" invalidates such an argument. I think character assassination is a lot more efficient and realistic than swaying someone with a respectful, well-constructed argument.
I think I agreed without reading correctly. To clarify, I'm invalidating the crazy argument by ignoring it and using personal attacks. I feel like that's not "positively arguing," although it is ad hdhovercraft.
|