Quote:
Originally Posted by ya.dingus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And therein is yet another problem with the argument. Anyone can interpret anything as negative, but that doesn't make them right.
Labeling problematic speech that wasn't problematic was one of the first steps the Leninist party took in controlling the public with setting up communism is Russia in the 20th century.
A little bit of history goes a long way in seeing the same ideological arguments reused today to the same misleading and dangerous effects.
Under your logic why call them Erudites, just call them humans. Scratch that, that's offensive to anyone not human, just call them people.
Scratch that, people is too generic of a term to bipedal creatures, call them entities.
The argument is insane, misleading, and dangerous.
Now since you've admitted that saying Dark isn't racist and has no racist connotation, then you've just admitted there is nothing wrong with the term, and therefore is completely okay to use.
Thank you for at least admitting it.
DMO will be back.
|
The JBS strongly opposed the Civil Rights Movement and its goals, including desegregation and ending discriminatory practices. They characterized the Civil Rights Movement as a communist plot to divide the country and promote subversion. They specifically opposed the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which mandated school desegregation, and busing for the purpose of school integration.