Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, I endorse only punishing someone when it's 100% clear to me they knew they shouldn't be doing what they were doing.
Those two edited a page that invited everyone to edit it. If you could get punished for editing a wiki page that invites you to edit it, how could that possibly be fair? Its like some kind of "gotcha" trap.
But consider another example: you knew no one wanted to read Zura's post in the wiki. You also knew Zura didn't want it there. And I know you knew, because I saw you undo his attempt to remove it eight times in the wiki history.
Does that clarify the difference for you?
|
Two things. The first thing is I caught you in yet another lie:
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
3) Falsely sincere disengenuous poster - you engage in conversations to prove your brilliance and win forum fights, but when a disagreement arises there is zero chance you will listen to the other side: in fact, if they present more logical evidence, you will just double down on stupid, and keep arguing against that logic no matter what.
|
Recently Zuranthium specifically called out a flaw in my DPS calculator. I found out it was true, and fixed it. I admitted I was wrong too. So you are a liar when it comes to what you think has happened regarding me and other posters, even ones I've disagreed with in this very thread.
Secondly, if everyone is allowed to edit, why did you remove Sscalez's changes but kept Zuranthium's changes for a week while the wiki was locked?