Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I believe they did abuse the wiki by editing the wiki to win the argument in this thread, rather than do it objectively. I disagreed with their changes, but they kept putting their changes back in without compromise.
|
Looking at
https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history I see a bunch of passionate editors disagreeing, but no clear wiki abuse. I didn't wade through every edit though, so if someone wants to draw my attention to actual wiki abuse, I'll happily change my mind.
Otherwise, I think the best thing is to give that page a week to let everyone cool off. As others in this thread have noted, a fresh thread (not full of DSM fights) would be the ideal place to discuss this topic more dispassionately, and hopefully that can lead to some productive consensus about the best direction of the page.