Within the contexts of the idea discussed, if you were someone who barely played emu's or wasn't familiar with EQlive at all, that makes who you are an entirely relevant thing.
Searyx and I go back too, but his experience running a server/ being well versed in coding/ being in top guilds on emu servers is not really a crutch I use to self-validate on a position I take.
Whatevs though. Your point is the burden of proof regarding intent. It can be found in certain circumstances. I doubt it will be a common thing, but if GM's want to give it an unbiased shot, let 'em, I say. We understand that the inverse of that is being falsely accused and consequently banned or shunned for something one didn't do. But that's not a terrible concern if you're not a dick hole that likes and/ or views training as natural. And it is in some ways, but in other ways it's fucked. I'm sure GM's understand that.
|