Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is true, so as I stated earlier, your going to be putting the GMs in charge of deriving INTENT behind actions. This is something that the fucking legal system has not learned how to do after 400years? This is asking for cries of GM favoritism upon every decision made. And you think the nonsense stupid fuck shit about P99's Trak poopsock is bad...
|
To an extent, yeah. But I expect them to crack down on it about as much as they did on Live, which was rare. Keldorn (TZ), for instance, was a retard and got banned, and he totally deserved it. But were GM's ever fucking on on TZ? No. When we needed them? No. When absolutely nothing was going on? Sometimes, but mostly no. If they have the resources here, I say go for it. Either way I'll survive.
I think after a while GM's can deduce intent. I'm not sure who you are, Envious, but I think you're from TZ. Anyway, with Rathe Council in PoP, my guild had problems with one DE SK Death Touching one of the council members to start the cycle when we weren't ready for it-- countless times. The logs alone should have been enough for a ban given the caustic relationship between Discordia and PDM, not to mention the clear intent of death touching a rathe council mob at 2%. If GM's are around to watch it and still can't make a call, whatever. At least people know they are there, and know they're trying.
I experienced a lot of deaths diffusing or relocating trains that were meant for my guild on live by the hands of competing guilds. It happens intentionally-- it will and does. But it also happens unintentionally fairly often. The way I see it is that if GM's want to try and take a stand against it, go for it. If nothing changes and no one is caught, so be it. It'll be just like Live. That is why we're here. Live like experience.