>The change in the standard reflects a broader understanding of free speech rights, with the "imminent lawless action" test providing greater protection to speech than the "clear and present danger" test
stopped there idk the changes, but you sign a TOS where you posted so 1a doesn't even apply I'm pretty sure, i mean the argument about twitter was town square or someshit but nothing actually got passed i assume
more interested in how 150 million dollars in burritos isn't getting paid tbh it's only 0.5% of the customers apparently but jesus christ.
|