Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The way I read the exchange it was DSM who misread Loramin.
DSM says one of the main benefits is the mana it saves [on casting invis]. Loramin critiques that and says "saving invis mana" as a shorthand for "saving mana on casting invis". He's not making up some new "invis mana" concept.
|
This makes no sense. To his credit, Loramin admitted he read my post wrong:
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Maybe I misread you on the mana thing
|
I am sorry your gotcha post failed again. Please stop doing this, it doesn't help OP, make you look good, or make me look bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The ring's power is not about saving invis mana, it's about saving mana on the (far more expensive) nukes you have to cast at the end of the fight
|
For context, he specified the mana saving wasn't for "invis mana", it was for nukes. Mana is mana, saving mana means you have more mana for any spell you want. I never claimed that the mana saved was exculsively used for invis.