Quote:
Originally Posted by Trexller
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
not likely the treasury but USAID was some little known agency that had good optics with the actual humanitarian aid it provides, so even if people noticed it doing funny things a politician isn't likely to call it out because it's bad optics to be seen as the one who cuts humanitarian aid
inside that organization they built a slush fund structure to channel taxpayer dollars to places of certain interest and influence
anytime that someone got too close or threatened their corrupt money streams, they could threaten to create a political incident by "screwing up" the humanitarian aid
|
Oh yea that all sounds reasonable in regards to USAID (and possibly other agencies as well)
It’s just when we move on to big fuckers like the Treasury and especially people on the right are expecting fireworks to come, it’s like come on
But now it’s being hyped to hell, so the public expects fireworks. Anything less will be seen (or at least broadcast by the left) as a bit of an L for Elon and Trump
And I don’t think modern day top down huge governmental fraud (like in the Treasury) involving lots of people and agencies/companies is likely without someone having blabbed about it long ago. Going back to my previous post where I mentioned in my opinion the more people in on or benefitting from a conspiracy, without anyone blabbing about it for personal gain, the less likely I feel that scenario is. I just know how easy it can be to manipulate a snitch