Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
-This could lead to erosion of press protections overturning this decision could weaken the First Amendment protections for the press, making it easier for public figures to win defamation cases.
-This could threaten investigative journalism like it has in European laws, this change could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism, as media outlets might avoid publishing critical stories out of fear of legal consequences.
-Holding public figures accountable for their actions is a key role of the media. Weakening press protections could lead to reduced accountability and transparency. Destroying the narrative with money is just a free pass for pushing propaganda.
-A free and robust press is essential for a healthy democracy. Limiting the press's ability to report freely could negatively impact public discourse and the public's right to know.
|
the press is already 100% captured by the companies that buy ads or just straight up owned by oligarchs now
everything your lighting your hair on fire about should of been dealt with 20+ fucking years ago, the war is over my dude
there needs to be a dr.strange love movie but instead of nukes it's the cyberpunk technocracy timeline we're on, so "stop worrying and love the AI CEO Overlords"