Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciderpress
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The company stole nothing by offering a set wage in exchange for labor. That the labor *might* deliver excess value eventually doesn't somehow retroactively implicate the employer in some moral crime. The risk is taken by the person signing the front of the check. If there's nobody to sign the front of the check, there are no photoshops to steal because I don't want to work for free anymore than you do.
Also there are things called raises, which also only exist if payroll continues to function.
|
Is signing checks the most valuable form of labor?