I appreciate the conversation has become civil again. Thank you to Troxx, BcBrown, and Jimjam.
To Bcbrown. With respect, my hunch is you are a little too pre-occupied in the theory of statistics, to the detriment of applying statistics practically.
Using the normal distribution in this post:
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=440
I was close enough to the parse data to support my position. My explanation is much better than any other explanation that has been given thus far. This is especially true considering the resistant nature of posters to supply data. My explanation shows how you come to the conclusion of "trivial" mobs, and why "non-trivial" mobs start to parse differently. As a bonus, it is friendly to both the formula and the programming code when looking at Torven's work.
Any contrarian could always proclaim that my data was insufficient, and thus it isn't valuable. But you should understand that the probability of getting the same pattern of results across multiple 10 minute parses, and a single 3 minute parse, on different mobs, is improbable if you want to claim my data is just random. Especially when the data matches my formula quite well.