Quote:
Originally Posted by p99portage
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Check out the other thread.
It was that long, we just got nuked by a single point of unreliable data.
|
So Nilbog has been building this place for a decade now. I think it's safe to say he's not biased towards any particular class ... or if he is, he's biased
towards Enchanters
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He also has been compiling classic evidence for a decade, which means that he likely has access to more classic research than anyone (even including our classic researchers, like Dolalin or Rygar).
So which makes more sense? That Nilbog had access to evidence beyond what was mentioned in that thread, and he corrected the spell's duration accurately ... or that he "nuked" Enchanters based on "single point of unreliable data"?