Quote:
Originally Posted by Otsego
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, let us recognize these biases.
You called out the no votes, but did no breakdown of yes votes - why?
It's because you're sending tells to everyone and anyone who will listen to you asking them to come here and support you by voting yes.
Your message in tells started off good, but you cannot in good faith say that how you close it off is not to cause bias and manipulation of the results.
Shame
|
Otsego, it’s disappointing to see you twist the situation like this. Yes, I reached out to people who were already aware of the ongoing discussion and who had expressed interest in the topic (like yourself). That’s hardly manipulation, it’s part of building a case and ensuring that all voices are heard, especially when the current system clearly benefits a small group at the expense of the broader community.
You’ve been consistently selective in your arguments, focusing on whatever fits your narrative while ignoring the broader issues of fairness and access that have been at the core of this discussion from the start. If you want to talk about biases, let’s recognize the ones that allow a few groups to monopolize content at the expense of everyone else.
If you’re genuinely interested in a constructive discussion, I’m open to it. But if this is just going to be about throwing accusations, then I think we’ve reached the end of a productive conversation.