Quote:
Originally Posted by Selene
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hello,
What is your opinion on the more boring class between Mage and wizard?
I had taken a break from playing the game for a while but am getting back into playing about ~2 hours a week now casually. I don't have the same drive for playing this game (or any for that matter) as I did before, but before I had quit, I played a mage up to 56 and got bored. The gameplay just felt too repetitive and simple as a mage. Also had a 58 druid, 52 pally, and 51 monk (the druid and pally were fun, until they weren't).
Now I don't want to play any class that would require too much investment/attention/devotion to the game (such as an enchanter or shammy), so I figured I'd ask if Wizzy is more "fun" to play than mage since I do think it suits a casual, semi-afk player perfectly. Thank you
|
I think dynamic fun gameplay and not having to pay attention or be invested are contradictoy, or at least at high tension with eachother. My recommendation is to have options for either priority, and decide which option to take each time you log in. For example quad the druid if you don't want to pay much attention, but charm on the druid or start an enchanter/necromancer/shaman for when you want to be more engaged?