Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Of course there's no rule about when pocket characters can be discussed. You're always free to bring up pockets in your arguments. But, crucially, anyone (or everyone) else is free to disregard any argument that relies upon pocket characters. No one else agrees with you, as far as I can tell. You haven't convinced anyone. Sorry.
|
Bolder and highlighted that for DSM. He seems to have stopped reading after the first sentence. DSMs case for shaman is so un-compelling and weak that that the only way viability is possible is if pockets are allowed.
Funny how shamans will need a pocket cleric but clerics do not need (or want pocket shamans).
This entire side debate is even more straightforward than the early arguments where the clerics was guaranteed a spot and we were bickering/dickering about who should be 4th