Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Simple question. Answers are binary in nature. Yes or no?
I’m still betting on you won’t answer. We all know why.
|
Dodging by asking another question. I'll answer your question, but you need to answer mine first. You do not get to ask another question to avoid a question.
Thus far Troxx hasn't provided any evidence that supports a pocket character restriction is in place for this thread. I have evidence against his claim too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Another dodge, with Troxx continuing to talk to himself. It appears that Troxx has conceded the point. He does not have an answer for where the restriction of no pocket characters came from. He has made it up out of thin air.
Here is the evidence that supports Troxx has made the pocket character restriction up out of thin air:
1. OP did not say pocket characters were prohibited.
2. Pocket characters are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster/priest group", and stop using mules and pocket characters when they've already used them in the past?
His arguments against pocket characters are invalid until he can show where this restriction came from.
|