Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It’s sunken cost vs authority fallacy then.
You assume playing a shaman for thousands of hours instead of tens of thousands of hours means someone can’t crack the cypher of alternating torp and canni.
My point is having more toons makes someone more objective and less biased. They all have flaws. I’m not proud of my 8.9 level 60’s. It’s very sad, TBH.
If a buddy has an enchanter, or two of them do, I will pick my class based on the need of the group. Not the need for me to prove I’m right about my favorite class. I can play a good ranger but am not so deluded to think it’s optimal.
I’ll let the poll I posted vote for me. I know how to best support enchanters based on my perspective but would appreciate theirs. Frankly, the best four person group is likely 4 enchanters with a cleric parked out.
|
I am just explaining the mechanics of the game. It is not sunken cost. You are assuming I am biased without evidence it sounds like.
A person who has an Enchanter or Cleric would also be biased under your logic, but I don't see you complaining about players with Enchanters or Clerics speaking up about how their classes work.
It always seems like the bias argument is alway levied at me, and never at the Cleric or Enchanter players. It is quite strange.