Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am not sure why. If person A says Vanilla is better, and person B says Chocolate is better, you are at an impasse until one person provides evidence supporting their claim that Vanilla or Chocolate is better. Person A does not simply get to declare victory by stating Vanilla is better.
Here is some made up math that shows how Malo can be better. Let's say you get 5 charm breaks per hour. Cleric Stun has a 20% chance to be helpful, based on things like spell resistance and how quick the Cleric reacts. Lets say Malo reduces charm breaks by 2. In the end, Malo prevents 2 charm break disasters, while Cleric Stun only prevents 1.
You need to explain why you think Cleric Stun helps more, ideally with some evidence. Otherwise you just have an unsupported opinion.
|
Even with Malo, a charm will inevitably break. Period. They have maximum durations.
When the inevitable break happens, a stun from cleric can save the chanter. Malo can help the chanter's own stun not resist, but Malo can't stun the mob for the chanter, and cannot save the chanter from being pushed or stunned.