Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This this thread has within its scope the full game. Like also levels 1-59. Enchanters can flat out solo most content that a small squad can be expected to tackle.
What content/targets does a shaman make possible that otherwise couldn’t be done with 2 enchanters and a cleric (just 3) couldn’t handle?
|
Precicely. As you said yourself, the Enchanters can solo the content already. A group of four casters with at least one Enchanter is stomping content so hard a Cleric isn't needed for the first 59 levels.
You bring the Shaman because they provide more use at level 60 with Torpor. West Waste Dragons and Fungi King are two level 60 camps where a Shaman is preferred over a Cleric. The truth is most camps that this group would be going after can use a Shaman instead of a Cleric, because Torpor Tanking with Slow is very effective. This thread doesn't allow Warriors in the group, so content that needs a Cleric to CH a Warrior is off the table. I liked some of 7ThGate's suggestions for possible Cleric camps, but those are pushing the limits of what this group could do, and also you'd run afoul of guild politics if any of your group members are in a guild.
If you are going the farm crew Wizard port route, Wizard/Shaman/Enchanter/Enchanter can solo three separate camps while waiting for bigger targets. Cleric can't solo a lot of higher value camps unless the group is spending a lot of money on things like Puppet Strings, so they'd just be stuck with an Enchanter who could solo the camp without the Cleric. You'd only have two separate camps being farmed if you had a Cleric.
A group of four level 60 casters can easily power level a shared pocket cleric account to 49 for occasional CH and reses.
I am glad we finally agree on something.