Quote:
Originally Posted by fortior
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Claiming a pocket cleric for pet CH is such a bullshit stretch. Yeah let me just pocket a shaman to malo and slow on every single pull in ST. Good grief.
|
Comparing a level 49 pocket cleric to a 60 Torpor Shaman is silly.
Let me remind you what a pocket character is, as people seem to forget in this thread for some reason:
https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxigen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh and then they need to pool all their resources to buy Torpor, a spell which also slows down pet dps.
lmao
|
If you have 2-3 Enchanters, you are spending a lot of money on Enchanter spells too. This is a silly argument. Torpor has also gone down a lot in price.
You don't Torpor the pets, the Shaman tanks the mob and Torpors themselves. Pets get more DPS because they are attacking from behind, and they don't take damage. Shaman can buff the pets too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My sentiments have not changed since page 76
|
Troxx still cannot name a camp that needs a Cleric CHing the pet, and he is a proven troll
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=114 .
He doesn't provide evidence for his claims, yet asserts he is correct. He can't even provide log data for DPS calculations. He believes a pixelated screenshot of an excel spreadsheet is good enough evidence, but log data and videos are not.
I have provided evidence for my claims in this thread, everybody can see it if they go back into the thread and check. Trolls simply claiming all of my evidence is invalid is nothing but a troll tactic. They can't provide counter-evidence, so they try to invalidate other people's evidence by trolling. It's the only strategy they have.