Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nobody is giving up cleric for shaman in this setup. Complete heal for pets, multiple lines of stuns to include aoe stun, rez, DA, powerful emergency heals Â…
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Tell us a specific camp that needs the Cleric CHing the character. Pocket Cleric is more than capable of handling the occasional res and pet CH.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As you can see, Troxx... cannot name even one camp that needs a Cleric CHing an Enchanter pet.
|
Hey DSM, just because you tell, demand, or ask another poster (such as Troxx) to do something (such as "Tell us a specific camp that needs the cleric CHing the character") does NOT mean they are under any sort of obligation to do so.
You should be well aware of this objective fact, as multiple previous posts in this very thread (from multiple different people) have repeatedly tried telling, demanding, or asking you to provide evidence of your Shaman root-rotting mobs separately from the group that your Shaman is actively playing/grouping with. You provided no evidence (despite your many hundreds/thousands of posts in this thread) that support your claims of such activities.
Therefore, I am not sure why your post seems to have an accusatory or "gotcha!" vibe, as if Troxx not doing what you told/demanded/asked him to do is somehow a bad thing or somehow proves that "Troxx is unable to explain his position, and cannot name even one camp that needs a Cleric CHing an Enchanter pet.", as it proves no such thing, and if it did, then by the same logic you would be simply inadvertently/unintentionally conceding that YOU YOURSLEF, by not providing evidence of your Shaman root-rotting mobs parallel to your group (that you are actively grouping with) would be sufficient cause for another poster (such as myself, Troxx, etc.) to objectively claim that you are incapable of providing evidence to support your claims of your Shaman root-rotting multiple mobs parallel to your group.
Additionally, your specific use of:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As you can see, Troxx... cannot name even one camp that needs a Cleric CHing an Enchanter pet.
|
was - objectively - a blatant straw man, because Troxx simply did not claim that any camps exist which "needs a Cleric CHing an Enchanter pet".
Cute straw man, was it fun to argue against?
Hehe.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]