Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This entire discussion is nothing but opinion, and Vexenu's opinion is as valid as anyone else's. You of course are free to go on advocating including pocket characters in your analysis, but it seems most people who have expressed an opinion on the matter are in favor of disregarding pocket characters.
|
People are free to express their opinions. But they cannot claim "no pocket characters" is a hard requirement of the thread. This has been done in the thread to dismiss what I am saying.
Unlike them, I am not restricting their opinions. I am simply pointing out they are wrong when they say pocket characters are prohibited in this thread.
They are also wrong to equivocate Main/Alt Characters to Pocket Characters, as explained here
https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4706
I also disagree with your premise that everything is opinion. We are dealing in facts too, and we cannot say facts of the game are opinions.
Someone can say a group of four clerics using rusty weapons to melee is the best group, because they like the playstyle. If they simply say it is their opinion, that is fine. If they make a factual claim that this group composition and rusty weapon strategy is factually the fastest leveling group possible, they have crossed from opinion into a factual claim. People can measure which groups compositions and strategies work the best to disprove this factual claim.