Off the top of my head I can think of zero content (either raid or group) that REQUIRES the knight spell book in a cooperative play environment with other players.
Group: On the group side I can think of some hard hitting group content that strongly benefits from warrior disc (gwurms) but not requires. Whether the disc outweighs the benefit of knight spell book … well that depends on gear and encounter. In general - a monk can substitute in for any of the tank classes. Assuming the warrior can hold aggro well - the critical benefit of knights are negated. Ultimately it’s a wash.
Raid: can’t think of anything that REQUIRES a knight spell book. There are obvious examples of encounters that require warriors.
Solo? Who gives a shit. We never disagreed here because there never was a disagreement. Warriors solo easy shit well enough that they can keep the xp bar moving when no groups are to be found.
——————
—————
Title is that warriors are useless in 90% of content.
This is not the case unless the premise is that you’d be better off bringing a monk (which a strong case could be made for). If that the stance we’re taking … well then knights are useless for 100% of content? I’m assuming the 10% residual is because you needed the warriors superior hit points, mitigation and and disc.
At the end of the day, this is just a silly silly thread.
|