Is DSM so intellectually stunted he can't see how an insult is not, by itself, an ad hominem?
Is he not capable of realising that it's only an "argumentum ad populum" when I try to use the majority as a counter argument, rather than a subjective observation that people are actually are not banding together in a conspiracy to sabotage DSM for our amusement, but that he's actually just an annoying little shit who rubs people up the wrong way?
All I'm saying is that you can't accuse someone of being a troll like it means something, which he somehow thinks it does.
|