Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I’m really confused what you’re trying to accomplish here.
First:
why in the hell would you parse this at 103 worm ac? My shaman is pretty shit geared for a level 60 (magelo below) and has 187 worn ac. 16 of that is shield ac. Why would you bother with a parse that is so ludicrously below the ac expectations of a shaman in this level range? I am genuinely confused.
|
That's easy. You consistently try and move the goalposts whenever the data shows you are wrong. Low AC tests ensure the DPS is not being affected by whatever random AC goalpost number you think is too high. If I put on more AC, I take less damage. Me taking less damage is not helping your argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You cannot assume that just because one mob is level 50 and has a hit range of whatever to whatever and another mob is level 48 and has a lower hit range (min vs max) means that they are directly comparable.
|
I have log evidence of PoM Rats doing less damage, and video/log evidence of the FM Giants under the Fort. You have yet to provide anything to back up this claim that the PoM Rats will do significantly more damage. You are just spouting random opinions right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually I’ll go you better and run my shamans ass to FM and parse that giant at 187 worn ac with a 70% slow
|
Yes, please go and actually collect data for once.