Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Examples of there being situations where FSI may be more useful than regen is certainly evidence for the case, but it doesn't disprove regen being being better than FSI.
Saying FSI helps you solo dragons at 60 better than regen may be true, but so is the fact that a rusty halberd helps bowquest better than any ToV melee weapon (due to how damage bonus works). I think we can agree just because we have an example of rusty halberd being better than tov weapons doesn't disprove the assertion that ToV weapons are better than rusty halberds.
|
The issue is you haven't proven Regen is better than FSI to begin with. You cannot simply assume this is the case for whatever reason.
Thus far I have provided a lot more evidence showing FSI is the Min/Max option than the opposition. It is easy to rebut the claims put forth so far from the opposition with math and evidence too.
This is the problem, you are claiming Regen has already been proven to be better than FSI without merit, and this makes no sense. Nobody has actually done this.